Sonja Lawson commits PERJURY - New Plymouth Court 25 July 2019 - sworn evidence:

Sonja Lawson and Brian Hunter - serial litigants, benefit fraudsters, and co-claimants.

Today in the Court at New Plymouth Sonja Lawson swore on oath that she had "never heard of Brian Hunter", "didn't know anything about Brian Hunter" and "didn't want to know anything about Brian Hunter.  She had already submitted these lies in writing in the form of various sworn affidavits:

Lawson recently sent numerous text messages begging for information regarding her co-claimant Brian Hunter and her claims to the contrary are blatant and deliberate PERJURY!

Here's the evidence that they are co-claimants, Sonja Lawson is very well aware of this document, it's got her handwriting on it and the date she received it.  The text messages refer to her desire to "deal to" Brian Hunter and the lawyers who have been assisting her and Hunter, but Lawson was a willing party to the submission of documents that she knew were fraudulent.  Lawson swore in the Court that she had never heard of Hunter and wasn't a co-claimant with Hunter in any legal action and had no interest whatsoever in his affairs or any lawyers representing him - that is indisputably perjurous - it was deliberate and premeditated!  This is her own handwriting on this document!  She is a LIAR!

Here's a message received from Sonja Lawson on 20 March - the affidavits referred to above, in which she denies all knowledge of Brian Hunter, are dated June or July, 3 or 4 months after she sent these messages:

For someone who claims to have no knowledge of Brian Hunter and no interest in Brian Hunter or the lawyers he is associated with, Sonja Lawson certainly has a lot to say about them:

The message above refers to the claim in which Lawson and Hunter are co-claimants, which is evidenced indisputably by the documents above, and it clearly contradicts the denial contained in Lawson's sworn affidavits and evidence given on oath in the Court.  That is clearly perjury.

Which is ironic given the arrogance with which Lawson and Hunter accuse others of perjury despite the fact that Lawson can't even spell the word properly - she knows exactly what it means.

The reference to Hunter working as a " Self Employed IT consultant" refers to the fact that Hunter claims to be an "invalid beneficiary" but is clearly working as well as receiving a benefit and this warrants closer scrutiny, as Lawson knows perfectly well, which is why she is seeking the information and asking for it repeatedly.  Further evidence of this is contained in the Court document reproduced below - the handwriting in the top right hand corner is Sonja Lawsons, and matches all the documents she submitted in Court.  She denied the existence of this document until she was confronted with it, whereupon she stuttered and stammered her pathetic lies and excuses:

The judgment of Churchman J makes a mockery of the this claim, filed by Chris Tennet, it describes the lack of merit to their arguments, the unprofessional and inept manner of their legal abilities, and general incompetence.  It is available at this link.